Hi Stewart, I plan to revise the draft in the coming weeks to address the comments from the ADs. I will double check your concerns as well. Thanks, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 4:56 PM To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx Cc: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark.all@xxxxxxxx; ipv6@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Not Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2021-08-12 IETF LC End Date: 2021-06-15 IESG Telechat date: 2021-08-12 Summary: I egret being late with this review. The majority of the concerns raised in my review of -06 appear to remain in the document, and all of the important ones have been picked up by the ADs. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
