Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 11:16:20 +0900
In-reply-to: <CAOj+MMF2Vr1LRin0WpBTM6UeRfi4FGQUpgp0SX4G2ftvtm23mA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <db8c1a5534e9412ebcfa37682d75f862@huawei.com> <C23D7023-B5B7-47C6-8AC5-65A98822A724@lurchi.franken.de> <CANMZLAZGawUjRhSSE_rA8AyqMx=mx1WFeJ_tZq0KVEXJd2XBfQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210807014730.GA28901@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAO42Z2yezZh5-B0PwCuNt2FUMAW-FjMK8QZ8uL4TsPhs26zziw@mail.gmail.com> <20210807151716.GA3098@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CALZ3u+a_7XQ+R8mV+9KzwRwxa0riP-QD_2R69ycV0NL9jy_S3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20210807175410.GA63079@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CALx6S36b33LD_hNFvptOJuny4g98=dhq3RtKsGeLx3ks-yYjFg@mail.gmail.com> <6F63D7FE-8768-4BD8-846E-61E50E44228F@lurchi.franken.de> <CALx6S36pbw2angEmDpu5DnX2nix9KgxFs7ExU17x+JXQFs23TA@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+Yt2X3faSVW7K0eaxmaQy6iA6p4=f0c4E_F4CP0tfjHYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHu9wSuG87_vBaGNY0oU0kMu9KPFPAwcP9+eFviCMErPg@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+YRfWspGYbFPQQyEGBxsS+0VhSAZq4MHWnWrMaW1HU-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMF2Vr1LRin0WpBTM6UeRfi4FGQUpgp0SX4G2ftvtm23mA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0

Robert Raszuk wrote:

But if someone uses anycast to establish long lasting TCP
sessions (say 12h) - Good Luck !


What if someone uses windows to establish long lasting
unicast TCP sessions?

							Masataka Ohta

References:
- IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Michael Tuexen
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Brian Carpenter
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Toerless Eckert
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Mark Smith
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Toerless Eckert
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Töma Gavrichenkov
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Toerless Eckert
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Michael Tuexen
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Töma Gavrichenkov
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Robert Raszuk
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Töma Gavrichenkov
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
  - From: Robert Raszuk

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]