Hi Carsten! Thanks for the review. > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 11:06 AM > To: last-call@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-03.txt> (Updating > References to the IETF FTP Service) to Proposed Standard > > On 2021-08-30, at 16:22, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to > > consider the following document: - 'Updating References to the IETF FTP > Service' > > <draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-03.txt> as Proposed Standard > > I’m all in favor of making the change — but is PS the right track for this? > (BCP?) The reasoning that motivated this document being PS was that it was updating other PS documents. No more nuance than that. Roman -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
