On 17-Sep-21 07:22, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 16. Sep 2021, at 09:46, Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Or, just automatically delete notes 30 days after creation. > > > (Again, I don’t know whether this was a serious proposal. I’ll treat > > is as such for the purpose of this message.) > > Well, I'm serious. > I think 30 days might be way too long. > > WG and design team leaders should know to download minutes at the end > of the session. It's not hard. > But, in order to train that, the contents needs to disappear within > the day, > and there will be some crying. Some WG session minutes will go away. One day is too short; back in the good old days, when most of us suffered jet lag after each meeting, a week to capture the minutes and copy-edit them was hardly enough. But I do agree, this is a major duty of WG chairs or secretaries, and needs to be done promptly. I wouldn't call it notes.ietf.org. I'd call it temp.ietf.org. Or at least, put everything in notes.ietf.org/temp/ and move it to notes.ietf.org/recycle/ after 30 days and then to /dev/null after another 30 days. Something like that, anyway, depending on how it would integrate with HedgeDoc. Brian [Qin] If you log on HedgeDoc using your IETF account, you will see all the WG's notes.ietf.org you have visited before. I can even see some WG notes 10 months ago. I agree to keep these temporary notes for a while. But to avoid confusion with formal notes/minutes maintained in each WG data tracker tool, we should stick to single source of truth principle and trust published minutes verified by WG chairs.
