Review is partially done. Another assignment may be needed to complete it. Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24 Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2021-08-18 IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-02 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready with Nits Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Only editorial comments: there are a lot of inconsistencies on US/UK spelling for instance acknowledgment vs acknowledgement, or e.g., vs e.g.. These should be addressed by the RFC Ediror. Note there is an i.e, (vs correct i.e.,) in 3.8.6.2.1. page 47. I did not fully verify the technical details mainly because I review I-Ds in public transports so without the whole collection of merged RFCs and errata. In fact I only checked the figure 5 section 3.3.2 page 17 because an arrow missed from it in the original RFC: this is addressed by the note 2 (I compared with the fixed state transition diagram of the TCP/IP Illustrated volume 2). There is a small note for the IESG in section 5 page 92 in the very last paragraph about a PERPASS/privacy review. Regards -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
