Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Claudio for your review! I balloted No objection.

Francesca

On 09/08/2021, 23:59, "Claudio Allocchio via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Reviewer: Claudio Allocchio
    Review result: Ready

    The document is consistent and ready for publication.
    Just as a style comment: section 1.4 is a bit unusual in an RFC, specifically
    by mentioning what happened during one IETF meeting, etc. Nothing wrong with it
    but it mixes a specification (the RFC resulting for publication) with historic
    actions. Maybe there is a way to avoid this by changing a bit the text of the
    1.4 section.

    Another comment: again all fine! but when a document like this updates/fixes
    other documents, including errata, new text replacing sections in other
    documents, etc, the implementer has a challenging task in putting the pieces
    together. I'd for the future suggest not to use this "amendment" technique, but
    to publish complete updated RFCs versions instead.



-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux