Thanks Sean for the review. Please see inline
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 09:17, Sean Turner via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Sean Turner
Review result: Ready
Hi! Reviewing this because I got asked. I will note that it appears this
document has already been through IETF LC, SECDIR, and GENART among others.
These two are pretty minor (and look like a secret secdir review):
1. I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis refers to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13}. Should
this I-D also refer to DTLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13} in s1? Pretty sure
changing the reference isn't going to slow down publication because this I-D
normatively references I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis.
Yes, I will update the draft to refer to DTLS 1.3.
2. Assuming that the answer is yes and you could use (D)TLS1.3 with this
protocol, I think you need to say something about or refer to the early data
concerns (see s7.2 of I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis). You might consider just
expand the 2nd sentence in the 1st para of s8 to also refer to s7.2 or
I-D.ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis ?
Sure, I will update the draft to discuss early data.
Cheers,
-Tiru
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
