Thanks Magnus, Based on several feedback, I plan to modify that paragraph as: " If configuration (or other means beyond the scope of this document) indicates that the peer is not a route server, that optional rule SHOULD be enforced. If the indication is that the peer is not a route server or there is no conclusive indication, that optional rule SHOULD NOT be enforced. " Hope it's good -J -----Original Message----- From: Magnus Nystrom via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:10 AM To: secdir@xxxxxxxx Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid.all@xxxxxxxx; idr@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx Subject: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14 Reviewer: Magnus Nystrom Review result: Has Nits I was asked to re-review -14 after my review of -13. I'd like to thank the authors for making updates based on my review of -13. The only additional suggestion I have is to ad a clarifying statement after the sentence "If the condition of the peer is unknown, the rule SHOULD not be enforced" along the lines of "As mentioned above, this does represent a security risk." -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call