Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Magnus,

Based on several feedback, I plan to modify that paragraph as:

"
   If configuration (or other means beyond the scope of this document) 
indicates that the peer is not a route server, that optional rule 
SHOULD be enforced. If the indication is that the peer is not a route server or there is no conclusive indication, that optional rule SHOULD NOT be enforced.
"

Hope it's good

-J

-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Nystrom via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:10 AM
To: secdir@xxxxxxxx
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid.all@xxxxxxxx; idr@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14

Reviewer: Magnus Nystrom
Review result: Has Nits

I was asked to re-review -14 after my review of -13. I'd like to thank the authors for making updates based on my review of -13. The only additional suggestion I have is to ad a clarifying statement after the sentence "If the condition of the peer is unknown, the rule SHOULD not be enforced" along the lines of "As mentioned above, this does represent a security risk."


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux