On 4/27/21 5:54 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
emphatically disagree, and I believe that's a particularly harmful concept to promote.Could you elaborate more on how your position relates to the BCP 25 description of "Document Editor"? §6.3 of RFC 2418 has: Most IETF working groups focus their efforts on a document, or set of documents, that capture the results of the group's work. A working group generally designates a person or persons to serve as the Editor for a particular document. The Document Editor is responsible for ensuring that the contents of the document accurately reflect the decisions that have been made by the working group.
In my experience WGs have often accepted the original
author(s)/editor(s) of a document as the Document Editor, and done
so without much (if any) formality. I think it mostly works
I'm not sure what this has to do, however, with the bit of the
reply that you quoted.
Keith
