Michael Thomas <mike@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Maybe one thing that could be done is to have a set of things that > newbies can do to participate that are likely to be taken very > favorably. What author doesn't like somebody who's gone through your > ID with a fine tooth comb for nits, bad grammar, unclear text, etc and > especially from fresh eyes from the perspective of a potential > implementer, for example. Everybody would win in that situation. Their > naivety is a huge benefit. As a guide(s) I've (we've) mentioned this specific helpful task to newcomers. However, reviewing documents is sort of "boring" task to many I'm sure. What I've (we've?) failed to do is also state "and by doing this your name will be put in the acknowledgements section", which honestly might help motivate some. Maybe. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
