On 12/05/2021 21:46, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
This has been addressed in -10 version of the draft. Cheers.
Indeed it has.
I note that some YANG clauses have [references] in them which are likely
not plain text; doubtless that will be fixed at some point in the process.
Tom Petch
On Apr 12, 2021, at 1:38 AM, tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This I-D introduces a new and unnecessary YANG prefix in defiance of BCP216 s.4.2.
It imports ietf-yang-types, perhaps the most widely imported module in the world, and RFC6991, where that module is specified, defines the proper prefix as 'yang'. This I-D invents a different one. Technically, YANG can cope with this but that does not make it a sensible thing to do.
Tom Petch
On 08/04/2021 13:43, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Babel routing protocol WG (babel) to
consider the following document: - 'YANG Data Model for Babel'
<draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2021-04-22. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines a data model for the Babel routing protocol.
The data model is defined using the YANG data modeling language.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
