IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: [tcpinc] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12
  • From: David Mazieres
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Martin Thomson
• letting IETF build on top of Open Source technology
  • From: Alia Atlas
• next steps on IETF Outreach
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12
  • From: Min Ye
• Re: ISOC money, was Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Intdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: ISOC money, was Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ISOC money, was Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: ISOC money, was Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: ned+ietf
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-13
  • From: Adam Montville
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: ISOC money, was Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13
  • From: Qin Wu
• conformance testing [wasRe: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IP's for point-to-point and loopbacks
  • From: Junior Corazza
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-13
  • From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: IP's for point-to-point and loopbacks
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: IP's for point-to-point and loopbacks
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Intdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-00
  • From: Jean-Michel Combes
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Automated draft submission
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Automated draft submission
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IP's for point-to-point and loopbacks
  • From: Scott Bradner
• IP's for point-to-point and loopbacks
  • From: Junior Corazza
• Re: Automated draft submission
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Automated draft submission
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-13
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-rollover-02
  • From: Min Ye
• Re: RESENDING - Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: RESENDING - Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
  • From: Jen Linkova
• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-13
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-13
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
  • From: tom p.
• Proposal to revise ISOC's mission statement
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
  • From: Qin Wu
• RE: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-10
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Feedback on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-13
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• RE: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• RE: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: [Netconf] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis- ***07
  • From: Phil Shafer
• Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• RE: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Recall: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• RE: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• CFP: PechaKucha at IETF-100
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-11
  • From: Colin Perkins
• RE: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Qin Wu
• RE: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09.txt> (Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Qin Wu
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-acme-07
  • From: Dale Worley
• RE: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-10
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13
  • From: Srihari Raghavan (srihari)
• RE: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re-send: Interim IETF Administrative Director hired!
  • From: IAOC Chair
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-10
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13
  • From: Fabio Maino
• Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-04
  • From: Rolf Winter
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09.txt> (Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• new drafts of TCP-ENO, tcpcrypt
  • From: Daniel B Giffin
• RE: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13
  • From: Qin Wu
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Carlos Martinez
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-10
  • From: Jouni Korhonen
• Share your favorite IETF meeting shirt pictures!
  • From: Greg Wood
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-12
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: Call for nominations for the IAOC appointment by the IESG
  • From: Lisa Winkler
• Call for nominations for the IAOC appointment by the IESG
  • From: IETF Chair
• IETF 100 Thursday Speaker Series Topic — 3 years on: Open Standards, Open Source, Open Loop
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: Side meetings experiment continuation for Singapore
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-07
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Side meetings experiment continuation for Singapore
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• RE: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Qin Wu
• RE: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09.txt> (Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Qin Wu
• RE: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Qin Wu
• RE: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [Lwip] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-07
  • From: Carles Gomez Montenegro
• Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-07
  • From: Carles Gomez Montenegro
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07
  • From: Daniel B Giffin
• Re: [rfc-i] RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 8253 on PCEPS: Usage of TLS to Provide a Secure Transport for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
  • From: Ranga Sam
• IETF 100 Final Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: [v6ops] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05
  • From: Brian Weis (bew)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-regext-launchphase-06.txt> (Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Trapp
• Re: [v6ops] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05
  • From: Tommy Pauly
• Re: Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09.txt> (Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• RE: Ops Dir review comments of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Nomcom 2017-2018: Reopening ART, Internet, and Transport nominations
  • From: NomCom Chair 2017
• Re: Last Call: <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-04.txt> (YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Responses to questions about the new IETF privacy statement
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: Last Call: <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-04.txt> (YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-04.txt> (YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-04.txt> (YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• RE: Ops Dir review comments of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-08
  • From: stephane.litkowski
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07
  • From: Dale Worley
• RE: [tcpinc] Making ECDHE-Curve25519 the only MTI for tcpcrypt (RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07.txt> (Cryptographic protection of TCP Streams (tcpcrypt)) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: Black, David
• ISE appointment
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Making ECDHE-Curve25519 the only MTI for tcpcrypt (RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07.txt> (Cryptographic protection of TCP Streams (tcpcrypt)) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Making ECDHE-Curve25519 the only MTI for tcpcrypt (RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07.txt> (Cryptographic protection of TCP Streams (tcpcrypt)) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: Denis Ovsienko
• New blog posting
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Reminder Oct 18 2-4pm EDT WebEx meeting invitation: IETF Local Communities and Outreach
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Making ECDHE-Curve25519 the only MTI for tcpcrypt (RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-07.txt> (Cryptographic protection of TCP Streams (tcpcrypt)) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-04.txt> (YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• RE: [mile] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Banghart, Stephen A. (Fed)
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
  • From: Antoni Przygienda
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IETF 100 Hotel Reservations
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
  • From: Eric C Rosen
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
• Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
  • From: Tony Przygienda
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Stuart Cheshire
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09
  • From: Carlos Pignataro
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02
  • From: Jim Schaad
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02
  • From: Jim Schaad
• Re: [Curdle] Genart last call review of draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02
  • From: Rob Stradling
• Genart last call review of draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02
  • From: Roni Even
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Martin Thomson
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-scream-cc-11
  • From: Ingemar Johansson S
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Secdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-04
  • From: Christian Huitema
• NomCom 2017-2018 Call for Feedback
  • From: NomCom Chair 2017
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-scream-cc-11
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: tom p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-04.txt> (YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Ops Dir review comments of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• IETF 100 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• New work at IETF 100
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• RE: I-D Action: draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-06.txt
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
• Opsdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
  • From: Carlos Martinez
• Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Peter Psenak
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Georgios Karagiannis
• RE: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: bruno.decraene
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09.txt> (Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
• Re: Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Eliot Lear
• TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-11
  • From: Yoshifumi Nishida
• Re: Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-02
  • From: Kamran Raza (skraza)
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Sam Sun
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• RE: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Alexander Clemm
• Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Request for feedback - IESG thoughts about new work proposals
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Needless playing with semantics [Was : WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)]
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Jeff Tantsura
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10
  • From: Jouni Korhonen
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-07
  • From: Jouni Korhonen
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-09
  • From: Sarah Banks
• Re: page numbers or not, was So do both
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Ben Maddison
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: [Curdle] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2-10
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Alvaro Retana
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Jay Borkenhagen
• RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
  • From: stephane.litkowski
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Job Snijders
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13
  • From: Takeshi Takahashi
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Jay Borkenhagen
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: David Farmer
• RE: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Job Snijders
• RE: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: [GROW] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Job Snijders
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Alexander Clemm
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• AUTH48 process for RFC 8244 <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-08.txt>: IAB statement addition?
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  • From: Randy Bush
• Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-23
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-23
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-23
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-07
  • From: Joel Halpern
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Keith Moore
• Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-02
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Lou Berger
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05.txt> (Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Esko Dijk
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-23
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Georgios Karagiannis
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• updated to address the comments from GenArt, OpsDIR, TSVArt review ( was FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-10.txt
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-09
  • From: Roni Even
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-05
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-05
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Mike StJohns
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Joel Halpern Direct
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Alexander Clemm
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Uma Chunduri
• Re: [Anima] Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05.txt> (Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: William Atwood
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Alexander Clemm
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Sign up for exciting IETF 100 events!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: R. Atkinson
• Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Erik Nordmark
• Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05
  • From: Joe Clarke
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: stephen . farrell
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Back from leave
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: FTP and file transfers
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: lloyd . wood
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Joe Touch
• Call for Nominations: 2018 Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP)
  • From: Matthew Ford
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Martin Thomson
• should we specify HTTP/1.1 now that HTTP2 is out?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Sign-up for PechaKucha presenters at IETF-100
  • From: Aaron Falk
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-voucher-05
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09.txt>
  • From: Marcus Bointon
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• WebMeeting on IETF Outreach and Local Communities: Oct 18 2pm - 4pm EDT
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Feature equivalence [was: ..sunset4-ipv6..]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• RE: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jacques Latour
• Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric C Rosen
• Re: End Work on IPv4
  • From: R. Atkinson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
• Re: [sunset4] s'wonderful or not, Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15
  • From: Adam Montville
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: ISOC Against its Own Principles: Acting as a Censor
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: ISOC Against its Own Principles: Acting as a Censor
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• RE: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Mehmet Ersue
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Dave Aronson
• Re: FTP and file transfers (was: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?])
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Considerations Considerations Section
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Denis Ovsienko
• RE: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-25 - motivation
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• ISOC Against its Own Principles: Acting as a Censor
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• FTP and file transfers (was: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?])
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update-03
  • From: Joel Halpern
• Re: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-25 - motivation
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-25
  • From: Christian Huitema
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lee Howard
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05
  • From: Brian Weis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lee Howard
• Re: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Denis Ovsienko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: tom p.
• Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-06
  • From: Susan Hares
• RE: Secdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• 答复: [Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Xialiang (Frank)
• Re: [Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
• Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-04.txt> (Service Models Explained) to Informational RFC
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-02
  • From: Jan Lindblad
• Secdir last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-05
  • From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard
  • From: stephane.litkowski
• RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
  • From: stephane.litkowski
• RE: [OPSAWG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-03
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard
  • From: stephane.litkowski
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: tom p.
• NomCom 2017-2018: Current slate of nominees
  • From: NomCom Chair 2017
• Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Hackathon room and sponsorship secured, more projects and participants needed
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-cubic-06
  • From: Mirja Kühlewind
• RE: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  • From: tom p.
• Re: [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06
  • From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
• Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Loa Andersson
• RE: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Eric Gray
• Re: Nomination reminder from the 2017-2018 NomCom
  • From: Mary B
• Re: WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  • From: Cullen Jennings