Hello Ines, Thanks again for your review. Edits have been made in our working version that we hope to post soon. On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ines, > > Thank you very much for your review! We're working on the comments > received and the nits you found will be addressed and are much > appreciated. > > Best regards, > Kathleen > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Ines Robles > <mariainesrobles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Reviewer: Ines Robles >> Review result: Ready >> >> RtgDir review: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt >> >> Hello, >> >> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The >> Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as >> they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special >> request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. >> For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir >> >> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would >> be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call >> comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by >> updating the draft. >> >> Document: Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators - >> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 12-11-2017 >> Intended status: Informational >> >> Summary: >> This document discusses current security and network management practices to >> help guide protocol development in support of manageable, secure networks. >> >> The draft is ready, few typos found. >> >> Comments: >> >> I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written and >> clear to understand. >> >> Major Issues: >> >> No major issues found. >> >> Minor Issues: >> >> Section 2: >> >> "... Following the Snowden revelations,..." => It would be nice to add some >> references here Yes, the problem we have had so far is finding ones that aren't articles that may not be stable. A quick search pulls up new ones like the following: http://fortune.com/2016/04/25/snowden-encryption-james-clapper/ We'll have to try again to find an academic publication. >> >> Section 2.2.5: >> "DRM..."=> I would expand it to Digital Rights Management (DRM) Added, thank you! >> >> Section 6: >> >> inlcudes=> includes Fixed, thanks. >> >> Section 6.1: >> "information For example" => period missing? Ack, thanks! >> >> Section 6.2: >> "soltuions" -> solutions Fixed. >> >> Section 7.1 title: >> "Encypted" => Encrypted Fixed. Thanks for your review! >> >> > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Kathleen -- Best regards, Kathleen