Hi Kathleen,
Ok, thank you for the feedback.
Best,
Ines.
2018-01-04 20:13 GMT+02:00 Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hello Ines,
Thanks again for your review. Edits have been made in our working
version that we hope to post soon.
Yes, the problem we have had so far is finding ones that aren't
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
<kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com > wrote:
> Ines,
>
> Thank you very much for your review! We're working on the comments
> received and the nits you found will be addressed and are much
> appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Ines Robles
> <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com > wrote:
>> Reviewer: Ines Robles
>> Review result: Ready
>>
>> RtgDir review: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
>> Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
>> they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
>> request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
>> For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>>
>> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
>> be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
>> comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
>> updating the draft.
>>
>> Document: Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators -
>> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 12-11-2017
>> Intended status: Informational
>>
>> Summary:
>> This document discusses current security and network management practices to
>> help guide protocol development in support of manageable, secure networks.
>>
>> The draft is ready, few typos found.
>>
>> Comments:
>>
>> I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written and
>> clear to understand.
>>
>> Major Issues:
>>
>> No major issues found.
>>
>> Minor Issues:
>>
>> Section 2:
>>
>> "... Following the Snowden revelations,..." => It would be nice to add some
>> references here
articles that may not be stable. A quick search pulls up new ones
like the following:
http://fortune.com/2016/04/25/snowden-encryption-james- clapper/
We'll have to try again to find an academic publication.
>>
>> Section 2.2.5:
>> "DRM..."=> I would expand it to Digital Rights Management (DRM)
Added, thank you!
>>
>> Section 6:
>>
>> inlcudes=> includes
Fixed, thanks.
>>
>> Section 6.1:
>> "information For example" => period missing?
Ack, thanks!
>>
>> Section 6.2:
>> "soltuions" -> solutions
Fixed.
>>
>> Section 7.1 title:
>> "Encypted" => Encrypted
Fixed.
Thanks for your review!
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
--
Best regards,
Kathleen