Hi, The IASA 2.0 effort is discussing the *future* of IASA and the IAOC. That isn't my concern here, and there's a mailing list for it (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20). What I'm concerned about is that fact that a couple of *current* IAOC slots are up for appointment shortly (by NomCom and IESG respectively), with several fine candidates in each case. All I'm asking is that in their considerations, the appointing bodies keep in mind the definition of the IAOC's role: The IAOC's role is to provide appropriate direction to the IAD, to review the IAD's regular reports, and to oversee IASA functions to ensure that the administrative needs of the IETF community are being properly met. The IAOC's mission is not to be engaged in the day- to-day administrative work of the IASA, but rather to provide appropriate direction, oversight, and approval. (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4071#section-3.2) Regards Brian Carpenter