Dear Stewart,
thank you for performing this review. All of your issues will be addressed
in version 9 of this I-D, to be released on Monday 11/13. In particular:
1. The issue over including an RFC2119 boilerplate:
2. s/obtain/obtain
DONE
3. Registration Categories including IPFIX
DONE (references added to both IPFIX as well as IANA IPFIX Registry info)
Specifically, the following text was added:
IPFIX data [IPFIX-D] defines IP flow information and mechanisms to
transmit such information. This includes flow attributes as well as
information about the metering and exporting processes is also
included. Such contain may be stored in a IPFIX registry [IPFIX-R].
As such, IPFIX information should be considered for defining
categories of registration information.
transmit such information. This includes flow attributes as well as
information about the metering and exporting processes is also
included. Such contain may be stored in a IPFIX registry [IPFIX-R].
As such, IPFIX information should be considered for defining
categories of registration information.
best regards,
John
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq >.
Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2017-10-15
IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-25
IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26
Summary: This is a well written document. There are a couple of things the
authors need to look at, but it is ready to be published
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
The authors should consider whether the 2119 boilerplate is really needed as no
RFC2119 keywords are used (something they point out to the reader) ======
a query-based interface is used by the the I2NSF Management
System to obatin information, whereas a report-based interface
SB Typo - obtain
=====
9.2. Registration Categories
SB> I would think that anything in the IPFIX registry was a candidate for such
categories, after all IPFIX is designed and used to monitor flows, often for
security reasons.
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
--
regards,
John