Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the review Mehmet.
Acee 

On 1/8/18, 2:07 PM, "Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Reviewer: Mehmet Ersue
>Review result: Ready
>
>I reviewed the document "OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility"
>(draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20.txt) as part of the Operational
>directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed
>by
>the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
>operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
>these
>comments just like any other last call comments.
>
>Intended status: Standards Track
>Current IESG state: In Last Call (ends 2018-01-11)
>IANA State: IANA - Review Needed
>Updates RFC 5340 (OSPF for IPv6) and RFC 5838 (Support of Address
>Families in
>OSPFv3)
>
>Summary:
>The document extends the Link State Advertisement (LSA) format by
>encoding the
>existing OSPFv3 LSA information in Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and
>allowing
>advertisement of additional information with additional TLVs.  The
>document
>provides backward compatibility mechanisms.
>
>There are no relevant nits in the document.
>
>I believe the document does not cause any issues related to operations and
>management. It has a clear language and looks ready for publication.
>
>Mehmet
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]