Re: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?

[Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> The problem at the IETF is that most people are too polite to explain to you the truth.

Most comments was lacking understanding either because the text was not clear (and it was modified) or because it cannot be right, but it is fine if there is consensus.

Best regards,

Khaled

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
To: Khaled Omar
CC: ietf ,rtgwg

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:46:29PM +0000,
Khaled Omar wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:

> I noticed that the IETF participants gives only negative comments
> regarding the submitted IDs, that is good in some cases if it is
> true, but to ignore the positive side

Calvin Coolidge, a former US president, apparently said that the
important job in the governement was not to promote good bills, but to
kill bad ones. There are already many protocols and many RFC. Adding
more is not a goal in itself.

> It's been long time on the rtgwg mailing list and didn't have any
> technical discussion or comments for KRP and NEP or even an official
> review.

The problem at the IETF is that most people are too polite to explain
to you the truth. So, let me try: your proposals are worthless and do
not deserve a serious discussion. Yes, I'm harsh, but this is because
many persons already kindly explained the problem to you, and you
apparently don't listen. So, I have to retry harder.