Re: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/12/2017 12:31, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> (Or to say it more simply: serve an IETF apprenticeship first. We
>> all did that.)
>>
>>    Brian
> 
> I sincerely hope that is not added to the text, nor ever in our minds. 
> 
> That view perpetuates seniority over content. We reject kings; I hope we reject elders, if that is their only relevant credential, too. 

That's not what I said, or at least not what I meant to say.

What I meant was that coming into the IETF with naive proposals is close to
guaranteeing failure. It's nothing to do with respecting elders; it's to do
with the immense complexity of the network.

   Brian

> Ideas are what matter, as does a willingness to listen when asking for feedback. 
> 
> Unfortunately, neither has been the case for for these proposals - and that, and only that, is the reason I won’t engage further.  If others do the same, I sincerely hope it is only for that reason. 
> 
> Joe
> 
> And admittedly, apprenticeship helps us all learn this, but again it should never be a bar. 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]