Hi Xufeng, You are correct, I looked at the wrong version. If explicit-neighbors feature is not supported, would you want to have the BFD client parameters (client-cfg-parms) configured in RIP? Otherwise operator needs to look at neighbors discovered and configure parameters under BFD for that neighbor. And when a new neighbor shows up, the same thing has to be done again. Please see email discussion with OSPF/ISIS YANG authors. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/KNipAESw8fGKuUKrCxFlhdkRA0Y Regards, Reshad. ________________________________________ From: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 4:50 PM To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman); ietf@xxxxxxxx Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg-chairs@xxxxxxxx; rtg-bfd@xxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Routing Information Protocol (RIP)) to Proposed Standard Hi Reshad, Can you please double-check the revision 06 of the document? draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-04 used bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms, and was taken out by draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-05. Please let us know if this is not the case, or we need to do something differently. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrahman@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 11:49 AM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg-chairs@xxxxxxxx; > rtg-bfd@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06.txt> (A YANG Data Model > for Routing Information Protocol (RIP)) to Proposed Standard > > Hi, > > The RIP YANG model uses bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms from BFD YANG. That > grouping does not exist in latest revision (it has been renamed). Also, as per > discussions we had with OSPF/ISIS YANG authors, the grouping which should be > used from BFD is client-cfg-parms. > > Regards, > Reshad. > ________________________________________ > From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of The IESG <iesg- > secretary@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:29 AM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg-chairs@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06.txt> (A YANG Data Model for > Routing Information Protocol (RIP)) to Proposed Standard > > The IESG has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG > (rtgwg) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model for Routing > Information Protocol (RIP)' > <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2017-12-12. Exceptionally, comments may be sent > to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the > Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document describes a data model for the Routing Information > Protocol (RIP). Both RIP version 2 and RIPng are covered. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > The document contains these normative downward references. > See RFC 3967 for additional information: > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis: A YANG Data Model for Interface > Management (None - IETF stream) > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores: Network Management Datastore > Architecture (None - IETF stream) > draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management > (NDMA Version) (None - ) > draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis: A YANG Data Model for IP Management > (None - IETF stream) > draft-ietf-ospf-yang: Yang Data Model for OSPF Protocol (None - IETF stream) > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg