Hi Linda, Thanks for the review. We have added some descriptions as you suggested, and posted an updated version of the draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 6:25 PM > To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; rtgwg@xxxxxxxx > Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07 > > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Nits/Comments > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-07 > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2017-12-04 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-12 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11 > > Summary: > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: It would be helpful to add description on why you need > both Tracking Interface and Tracking network. Both of them have the same > description "to detect interface connectivity failures". What kind of > "connectivity failures" will be reported over the "Tracking Interface"? what > connectivity failures will be reported to "Tracking Network"? > > Thanks, Linda Dunbar > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art