> first, i have no right to comment as i did not test during test phase, > but i gather from folk who did that classic advice was repeatedly > ignored. FWIW, I looked at it once and at the comments, and this aligns with my observations. > it meets all three major requirements for a web site revamp done by a > clueless marketing department: > o the front page is useless gl!tz obscuring all content with glossy > garbage. and i checked the igf web site front page. they do no have > a picture of an ietf meeting. did the exchange deal go sour? > o it takes more clicks to get to the functions folk use most, if they > can find them at all. I appear to be in the latter camp for the most part. > o it breaks links into the site from all over the planet. > amazing disaster. this is embarrassing. +1 Ned