On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:51 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22/12/2017 16:29, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody know why IETF 100 is showing only 14 people as having attended?
I can't answer that, but the number shown for IETF 101 is 1018, which is the correct number for IETF 100. Since IETF 101 hasn't happened yet, I think we know what *might* have happened.
Huh, I wonder if that means 14 people have already gone to 101.
W
Brian
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/stats/meeting/overview/
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
---maf
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants.
---maf