IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-25
  • From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-08
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Remote presenters for HotRFC in Vancouver? (was: Re: Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Remote presenters for HotRFC in Vancouver? (was: Re: Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?)
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• RE: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: Remote presenters for HotRFC in Vancouver? (was: Re: Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?)
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Remote presenters for HotRFC in Vancouver? (was: Re: Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Free (as in beer) webex
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Free (as in beer) webex
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-17
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] [EXT] [Ntp] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
  • From: Ian Swett
• [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
  • From: Ulrich Windl
• [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] [Ntp] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
  • From: Ulrich Windl
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-16
  • From: Bernie Volz via Datatracker
• Free (as in beer) webex
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Side meetings in a virtual IETF meeting ?
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Andrew Alston
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14
  • From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gellens-lost-validation-05.txt> (The LoST-Validation S-NAPTR Application Service Tag) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gellens-lost-validation-05.txt> (The LoST-Validation S-NAPTR Application Service Tag) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dan Banks
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Melchior Aelmans
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Job Snijders
• Fwd: Resignation request
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: Resignation request
  • From: Andrew Alston
• Resignation request
  • From: Sander Steffann
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Gonzalo Salgueiro via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-17
  • From: Christian Huitema via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gellens-lost-validation-05.txt> (The LoST-Validation S-NAPTR Application Service Tag) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gellens-lost-validation-05.txt> (The LoST-Validation S-NAPTR Application Service Tag) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dan Banks
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Gorry Fairhurst via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-08
  • From: Ian Swett via Datatracker
• RE: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Ines Robles
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
  • From: Theresa Enghardt
• Call for agenda items - Secdispatch IETF107
  • From: Francesca Palombini
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: Zafar Ali (zali)
• [Last-Call] draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• RE: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
• FYI: NetDev 0x14 postponed (Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver)
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: Tim Chown
• [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Guntur Wiseno Putra
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Andrew Alston
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Andrew Alston
• Re: Cookies as a transmission vector [was: Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver]
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• RE: Cookies as a transmission vector [was: Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver]
  • From: Ron Bonica
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: List of designated experts?
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: List of designated experts?
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: List of designated experts?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: List of designated experts?
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• List of designated experts?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [spring] WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-05
  • From: Susan Hares via Datatracker
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif -05
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14
  • From: Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04.txt> (Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael Richardson
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
  • From: David Black via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Cookies as a transmission vector [was: Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver]
  • From: John Scudder
• IETF 107 Final Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-github-wg-configuration-06
  • From: Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ext] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04.txt> (Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-04
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: tom petch
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-04
  • From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
• [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Guntur Wiseno Putra
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Guntur Wiseno Putra
• Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
  • From: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Dino Farinacci
• Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• RE: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Int-area] [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
  • From: Ragnar Sundblad
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04.txt> (Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-08
  • From: Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-08
  • From: Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
  • From: Sean Turner
• pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria
  • From: Joerg Ott
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
  • From: Ragnar Sundblad
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05
  • From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Thomas Fossati
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: Ben Ramsey
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
• Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Roni Even (A)
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexander Pelov
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
  • From: John Dickinson
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: tom petch
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Roni Even (A)
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: San Francisco's mayor has declared a state of emergency as the coronavirus continues to spread
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
  • From: George Michaelson
• Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Changes to the way we manage mailing lists
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Changes to the way we manage mailing lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Paul Wouters
• COVID-19, rfp-announce, and sale of .ORG entwined
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: San Francisco's mayor has declared a state of emergency as the coronavirus continues to spread
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Warren Kumari
• San Francisco's mayor has declared a state of emergency as the coronavirus continues to spread
  • From: Casey Farrell
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Ron Bonica
• Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
  • From: Laurence Lundblade
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• RE: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Mirja Kuehlewind
• Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Joseph Potvin
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Paul Wouters
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Andrew Alston
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Davey Song
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Michael Richardson
• [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: tom petch
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
  • From: Ana Minaburo
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: tom petch
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: tom petch
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ulrich Windl
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
  • From: Brian Weis
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria
  • From: Carl Wallace
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
  • From: Ana Minaburo
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Mary B
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-11
  • From: Roni Even (A)
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
  • From: Brian Weis via Datatracker
• UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
  • From: Ben Ramsey
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
  • From: Arleen Elliott
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-11
  • From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Watson Ladd
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Steven Sommars
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
  • From: Schönwälder, Jürgen
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
  • From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Steven Sommars
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
  • From: Brian Carpenter via Datatracker
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: Fred Baker
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14
  • From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
• Re: [107all] IETF 107 Registration and Reservations Cut-off Date Reminder
  • From: Mohammad Faisal
• IETF 107 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• IETF 107 Registration and Reservations Cut-off Date Reminder
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michael Richardson
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
  • From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] This email address is no longer available
  • From: Webmaster
• New work at IETF 107
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
  • From: Mališa Vučinić via Datatracker
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: Jay Daley
• RE: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
  • From: Tadahiko Ito
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: Brian Campbell
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Christian Hopps
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-07
  • From: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Rodney Van Meter
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michael Richardson
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-05
  • From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michal Krsek
• RE: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: limiting our set of cities
  • From: Jared Mauch
• limiting our set of cities
  • From: Michael Richardson
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
  • From: Liang Xia via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Karen O'Donoghue
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-04
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Updated potential meeting location list
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-06
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Erik Nygren
• RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Franke, Daniel
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Karen O'Donoghue
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Watson Ladd
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul Wouters
• ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ulrich Windl
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
  • From: Schönwälder, Jürgen
• Re: Inform: 2020 IETF Executive Director Goals
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Harlan Stenn
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Hal Murray
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Harlan Stenn
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Daniel Lublin
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
  • From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
  • From: Bernard Aboba via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
  • From: David Schinazi
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marcus Dansarie
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-03
  • From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-03
  • From: Mehmet Ersue via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12
  • From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
  • From: Erik Kline via Datatracker
• Another strategic discussion (Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
  • From: Pete Resnick via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06
  • From: Tim Chown
• Scaling the IETF (Re: Excessive use of interim meetings)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06
  • From: Brian Rosen
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: Roni Even (A)
• Re: Inform: IETF LLC Board F2F Summary
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Rob Sayre
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: Ron Bonica
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?
  • From: Laurence Lundblade
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Inform: IETF LLC Board F2F Summary
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-13
  • From: Enrico Francesconi (IGSG-CNR [ex ITTIG-CNR])
• [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12
  • From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-03.txt> (Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: avri doria
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
  • From: Tal Mizrahi
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-03.txt> (Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julien ÉLIE
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
  • From: Roni Even (A)
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-10
  • From: Tengfei Chang
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Last-Call] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-10
  • From: Vijay Gurbani
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• IETF WG meetings and remote participation
  • From: Robert Raszuk