On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:50 PM Larry Masinter <LMM@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Nico wrote
Then take this to the limit. Suppose we did some number TLS extensions
this way, with several overlapping somewhat, but in ways the authors did
not care to unify. What would happen?
-Ekr wrote:
> Well, we're running this experiment now, and have been ever since late 2018, so I guess we'll find out. So far it does not seem to have been an issue.
The “running code” part of “ rough consensus” seems useful in resolving disputes about a working group dropping or disagreeing to some work.
Perhaps.
However, what we found is that we were spending quite a bit of time evaluating documents when what the authors really wanted was a code point. This change has reduced the need for that.
-Ekr
