Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ole,

In my opinion those kinds of decisions belong to all of us. Consensus.

Anyway, I was not talking here about the recent decision but about taking now a decision about Madrid in July.

Someone send me a private email (suggested to send to the list) that effectively shows that the virus is not resistent to heat, so as much as we move towards spring/summer, less chances to propagate. Of course, we should not ask to have the meeting rooms freezing!

I still think that anyone taking a decision instead of following the host country recommendations is arbitrary. We just disagree.
 
Regarsds,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 11/3/20 16:25, "ietf en nombre de Ole Jacobsen" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx en nombre de olejacobsen=40me.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:

    Jordi,
    
    With all due respect, the decision was not “arbitrary.” As has been explained
    repeatedly, the cancellation was more of a “side-effect” of Covid19 rather than
    a major concern about the health risk of our attendees. This “side-effect” was
    explained in the announcement: 
    
    "This decision is based on input we gathered from Working Group (WG) and Research Group (RG) chairs about our ability to hold productive WG and RG sessions at IETF 107.
    Our assessment of this feedback is that a majority of sessions would not be viable if we were to hold the in-person IETF meeting. On this basis, we believe we cannot hold an effective in-person meeting.”
    
    Ole
    
    
    > On 11 Mar 2020, at 08:17, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > 
    > I hope we don't get so crazy with Covid19 so we keep it going against our freedom so many months.
    > 
    > It took me 20 years to get IETF in Madrid! I should sue the virus itself!
    > 
    > Seriously, I still got doctors from the neighborhood that keep telling me that as closer we are to the summer, smaller are the chances of the virus to resist and propagate.
    > 
    > If the situation is bad, I hope this time we don't take an arbitrary decision and we decide based on the local government decisions.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    > @jordipalet
    > 
    > 
    
    Ole J. Jacobsen
    Editor and Publisher
    The Internet Protocol Journal
    Office: +1 415-550-9433
    Cell:   +1 415-370-4628
    Web: protocoljournal.org
    E-mail: olejacobsen@xxxxxx
    E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Skype: organdemo
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux