As a user of the VIM editor since its inception (90'th sometimes)
i would of course like to see this compressed to VIM107
(Virtual IETF Meeting)
Cheers
Toerless
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 08:38:42PM -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
> John,
>
> > On Mar 11, 2020, at 7:20 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 18:54 -0400 Phillip Hallam-Baker
> > <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Keep them for Madrid which will now be IETF 107.
> >>
> >> Of course, now that I have pointed that out, a virtual IETF
> >> may well be inescapable even if it is only a proforma virtual
> >> plenary.
> >>
> >> That would address John's point about seating the new IESG.
> >
> > Just my opinion, but I don't think you can have it both ways.
> > If the new IESG (and so on) are seated this month, as I think we
> > are all expecting it will be, then that is IETF 107, no matter
> > how virtual.
>
> I published the tentative agenda for 6MAN w.g. earlier today, I called it the:
>
> Virtual Vancouver IETF 107 Meeting
>
> Bob
>
>
--
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx
