Dear Mr Raszuk,
At 02:36 PM 28-02-2020, Robert Raszuk wrote:
His information about 6man AD not accepting the Errata: 5933 is
correct. Errata must be first accepted by an AD then processed
further. Since it was posted on 11th Dec 2019 it was still not
accepted at first stage. You are mixing AD acceptance / validation
with IESG decision. Those are completely different errata processing phases.
Once an erratum is reported [1], a report is automatically sent to
the Working Group Chair(s), the author(s) and the Area
Directors. The relevant Area Director ensures that there is adequate
review and the erratum is classified. There isn't any IESG decision
for the errata processing phases.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5646
