--On Saturday, February 29, 2020 05:48 -0800 S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Mr Raszuk, > At 02:36 PM 28-02-2020, Robert Raszuk wrote: >> His information about 6man AD not accepting the Errata: 5933 >> is correct. Errata must be first accepted by an AD then >> processed further. Since it was posted on 11th Dec 2019 it >> was still not accepted at first stage. You are mixing AD >> acceptance / validation with IESG decision. Those are >> completely different errata processing phases. > > Once an erratum is reported [1], a report is automatically > sent to the Working Group Chair(s), the author(s) and the Area > Directors. The relevant Area Director ensures that there is > adequate review and the erratum is classified. There isn't > any IESG decision for the errata processing phases. > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > > 1. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5646 More important, even having the erratum marked "verified" does not change the substantive content of the a standard. That would require a new document, IETF Last Call, and IESG review and signoff, presumably followed by RFC publication.
