Because some mis-understood my request for info as questioning the decision, let me be explicit: I think they made the right decision.
On 3/10/20, 3:42 PM, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The IESG and the IRTF Chair have been assessing the viability of the in-person meeting based on the community’s ability to be productive. Assessment of health concerns has been the job of the LLC, on a separate track.
Could the LLC have cancelled the meeting? How separate were the tracks? The IESG didn't consider health concerns at all?
To put it in common business terms, I think we're owed a root cause analysis of the full decision-making process by all parties.
