Rich
Let me add to Adam’s helpful note, speaking only for the LLC here. I certainly intend to have an internal debrief to identify any outstanding issues and lessons for next time and then share details of that and get comment. This is important as a number of decisions were made on the fly and we need to circle back to have those validated/challenged. For example, our decision to follow public health advice was made in the absence of a community decision and was maintained despite a few community members expressing very strong disagreement (largely in private). I don’t however see any benefit in producing the kind of detailed timeline of actions and decisions that is normally part of a root cause analysis. This is not a crash investigation so we don’t need to get forensic. Yes the LLC track was entirely separate and focused primarily on the health risk. I would welcome a discussion about the reasoning and decision making around this as part of the process outlined above. Finally, perhaps the most important thing to note about the decision making is that the IESG followed an evidence-based process, focused on their area of control and made a rational decision based on the data they collected. That’s not easy in these circumstances. Jay -- Jay Daley |
