Dear Zafar,
At 10:01 PM 01-03-2020, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Furthermore, since IETF106, Spring WG has only one active chair, as
stated by Martin in the above email.
A copy of Martin's email is cut-and-pasted for quicker reference:
There is an email at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/c_pEmX92LmgokljYGlXxiZwarHU/
The information about the working group roles is confusing. On one
hand, it has been mentioned that "only one active chair" and on the
other hand there are three persons listed as "must be present" (two
Working Group Chairs).
Please see the content at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/N5j4CZAbTtjtzffvi7DbjVVfU3M/
There is an IESG item about: "work on some mechanism to obtain wider
or private feedback from people who are disenfranchised; anonymous
flagging of offensive emails to inform leadership; more opportunities
for private feedback".
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
