Vijay, thanks for your reviews. Authors, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 25, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Roni Even (A) <roni.even@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Vijay thanks, > The document will be published as an Informational RFC and not a proposed standard. > Roni > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@xxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 6:45 PM >> To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx >> Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines.all@xxxxxxxx; avt@xxxxxxxx; last- >> call@xxxxxxxx >> Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-11 >> >> Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani >> Review result: Ready >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review >> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for >> the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD >> before posting a new version of the draft. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-11 >> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani >> Review Date: 2020-02-24 >> IETF LC End Date: None >> IESG Telechat date: 2020-03-05 >> >> Summary: This document is read for publication as a Proposed Standard. I >> had reviewed version -08, and all of my comments from that version have >> been addressed in -11. I have no further comments. >> >> Major issues: 0 >> >> Minor issues: 0 >> >> Nits/editorial comments: 0 >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
