I put this in an RFC Editor note. Alissa > On Feb 24, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Martin Thomson <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks Brian, > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 17:01, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker wrote: >> Is this draft intended to become part of BCP25? I think it would be >> useful for the IESG to clarify this rather than leave it to the RFC Editor. > > This is a good question. Given the intended status of BCP, I would say that integrating into 25 is better than creating a new number. I don't know how to best signal this intent though. > > And I fixed the nit in the copy on GitHub. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
