> On Feb 27, 2020, at 6:57 AM, Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:32 PM Vittorio Bertola > <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Il 27/02/2020 14:06 Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: >> But people that have to attend multiple WGs that meet on the same day would potentially have to stay up for 24 hours, if each of those WGs chose a different timezone. I think this would be even worse, and it would make it hard to pop into WGs that you do not normally follow, which is one of the added values of IETF meetings. > > Just a thought: in a fully virtual scenario there is no need to keep > all the meetings within the current 4.5 days wide slot. True, but only works if participants only participate in IETF. For me, that would be a non-starter.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
