Contributor - not co-author - but also with 6 drafts that have normative references to the draft in question that could not proceed if this stalled
Andrew
On 03/03/2020, 00:44, "ietf on behalf of Sander Steffann" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of sander@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
> I have no information about the situation but I do not understand why an AD would be declaring consensus in any case -
> that is normally the responsibility of WG chairs. see RFC 2418 section 3.3
The only active/available WG chair was a co-author of this draft.
Cheers,
Sander
