Hi Eric,
At 06:16 AM 10-03-2020, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
As an IESG member, I balloted an ABSTAIN [1] on this document mainly
for two issues that you also listed:
- IPv4-only in 2020 for the IETF? Really ?
- relying / advising to use a single commercial company web site
(even if Microsoft won't go bankrupt any time soon but their 'free
access to everyone' rule can be changed anytime)
I am still amazed by those 2 documents even if I am a daily users of
github.com (for personal use) and of a corporate bitbucket (for business).
Microsoft could decide that GitHub no longer fits in its
strategy. It could decide that the current "free access to everyone"
offer is no longer viable. I also have some experience of problems
.... I prefer not to recommend or rely on a single commercial company
because of that.
I took a quick look at the other draft from the working group. The
document is intended to spur discussion. It is debatable whether it
achieved the intended purpose.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
