IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
- Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04.txt> (Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-04
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-04
- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
- [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
- [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
- Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
- Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
- From: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- RE: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
- Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04.txt> (Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-08
- From: Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-wireless-tests-08
- From: Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
- pure-virtual asynchronous meetings?
- Re: [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05
- From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
- Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- Re: Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- RE: Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Make an all-virtual IETF meeting a 24 hour affair
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Why are Cloudflare checking my browser?
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
- Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- Re: San Francisco's mayor has declared a state of emergency as the coronavirus continues to spread
- Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
- Ancient history [Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.]
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Changes to the way we manage mailing lists
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Changes to the way we manage mailing lists
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- COVID-19, rfp-announce, and sale of .ORG entwined
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: San Francisco's mayor has declared a state of emergency as the coronavirus continues to spread
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- San Francisco's mayor has declared a state of emergency as the coronavirus continues to spread
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- RE: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- What can IETF do? Re: Further update on COVID-19
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- [Last-Call] last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
- Re: Changes to the way we manage RFPs
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
- [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- RE: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-11
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17
- From: Brian Weis via Datatracker
- UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
- Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-guidelines-11
- From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
- From: Schönwälder, Jürgen
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
- From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
- From: Brian Carpenter via Datatracker
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14
- From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
- Re: [107all] IETF 107 Registration and Reservations Cut-off Date Reminder
- IETF 107 Preliminary Agenda
- IETF 107 Registration and Reservations Cut-off Date Reminder
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] This email address is no longer available
- New work at IETF 107
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-05
- From: Mališa Vučinić via Datatracker
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- RE: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-07
- From: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-05
- From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- RE: limiting our set of cities
- From: Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- Re: limiting our set of cities
- limiting our set of cities
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
- From: Liang Xia via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-04
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- Re: Updated potential meeting location list
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-06
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02
- RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
- Re: [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard)
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
- From: Schönwälder, Jürgen
- Re: Inform: 2020 IETF Executive Director Goals
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00
- From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
- From: Bernard Aboba via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: [Last-Call] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-03
- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-03
- From: Mehmet Ersue via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
- From: Erik Kline via Datatracker
- Another strategic discussion (Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?)
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-07
- From: Pete Resnick via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06
- Scaling the IETF (Re: Excessive use of interim meetings)
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: Inform: IETF LLC Board F2F Summary
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- Re: Inform: IETF LLC Board F2F Summary
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-13
- From: Enrico Francesconi (IGSG-CNR [ex ITTIG-CNR])
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12
- From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-03.txt> (Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Excessive use of interim meetings
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: Excessive use of interim meetings
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-03.txt> (Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- SE Asia is painful for many, why has it become a preferred destination?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - timezone
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: [Last-Call] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-10
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: [Last-Call] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-10
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- IETF WG meetings and remote participation
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
- Re: [107all] Travel restrictions affecting IETF 107 Vancouver
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
- Re: [Last-Call] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-10
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: [Last-Call] [MMUSIC] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- RE: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-11
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-10
- From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Cancellation - due to company restriction
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
- From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-18
- From: Christopher Wood via Datatracker
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11
- From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: [Last-Call] [dnssd] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [dnssd] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- From: Samita Chakrabarti via Datatracker
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: Jordi Palet Martinez
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
- Deadline Extended! Call for nominations: RFC Editor model evolution program chairs
- From: IAB Executive Administrative Manager
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-13
- From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- From: Joseph Touch via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-11
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-07
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16
- From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-07
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-11
- From: Colin Perkins via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
- From: Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-07
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- From: Tianran Zhou via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [dnssd] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- Upcoming Community Consultations
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14
- From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
- Re: IETF Tools Architecture and Strategy Team
- Re: IETF Tools Architecture and Strategy Team
- Re: [LLC-Board] LLC Board Meeting Details - 12 December 2019
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-04
- From: Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
- Re: IETF Tools Architecture and Strategy Team
- Re: [LLC-Board] LLC Board Meeting Details - 12 December 2019
- Re: [Last-Call] [6lo] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-13
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-12
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [EXTERNAL] [dtn] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-21
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- From: Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: LLC Board Meeting Details - 12 December 2019
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
- Re: [Last-Call] [EXTERNAL] [dtn] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-21
- From: Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]