> On Feb 27, 2020, at 7:09 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:06, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> There have been a number of comments that an all-virtual IETF meeting would be difficult for some set of attendees due to time zone shifting while they're in their home time zone. While it's impossible to hold a particular WG session that works for ALL attendees around the world, let the WG chairs choose, for each WG, what time out of the 24-hour clock works for the majority of their active participants. It'll be up to the WG chairs to figure that out for each WG, with the approval of the relevant AD. But there's no reason why all of the WGs need to meet during the same "daylight" hours if the meeting is all virtual. WGs could also have multiple sessions optimized for different parts of the world, to spread the pain. Just a thought .... >> >> Cheers, >> Andy >> > > That is not a good idea. > > Different WGs would pick different “day” times making it difficult to attend multiple groups. Right, it would require attendees to stay awake for 24 hours for multiple days. Not very workable. Bob > > A better idea is to shift your day to whatever TZ is proposed for the meeting as a whole. That will be no different from what you have to do when travelling, with the advantage of no dehydration and no time lost at the airport. > > - Stewart > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
