Sorry, that’s what I meant.
Jay b On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:02 PM Jay Daley < jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Barry
On 27/02/2020, at 10:58 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:59 AM Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ietf-lastcall split has been good for ietf-announce volume, but
But here's the thing: That split should have not affected the volume
on ietf-announce *at all*. It should have reduced volume on
<ietf@xxxxxxxx>, which is a very different thing. This isn't the
message thread to discuss that further, but I mention it here to lead
into agreement with some other comments:
I believe that having a new "rfp-announce" list is a fine thing *if*
RFC announcements are posted to *both* ietf-announce and rfc-announce.
That should satisfy all the concerns here: those who subscribe to
ietf-announce need to change nothing and will still get RFP
announcements, and those who only want RFC announcements and not the
other stuff can subscribe only to rfp-announce -- it's an individual
choice.
In order to close this thread I will cc: ietf@ietf on all posts to rfp-announce, which is trivial to do.
Jay
Barry
--
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@xxxxxxxx
+64 21 678840
|
