On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:59 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The ietf-lastcall split has been good for ietf-announce volume, but But here's the thing: That split should have not affected the volume on ietf-announce *at all*. It should have reduced volume on <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, which is a very different thing. This isn't the message thread to discuss that further, but I mention it here to lead into agreement with some other comments: I believe that having a new "rfp-announce" list is a fine thing *if* RFC announcements are posted to *both* ietf-announce and rfc-announce. That should satisfy all the concerns here: those who subscribe to ietf-announce need to change nothing and will still get RFP announcements, and those who only want RFC announcements and not the other stuff can subscribe only to rfp-announce -- it's an individual choice. Barry
