Adam, Do you plan for the new version of draft-roach-bis-documents to reflect the IESG's (presumably pending) response to my recent appeal? I ask because the interactions between the two might lead to a lively discussion and hence require somewhat more time than a simple presentation of a new iteration on the document would require. best, john --On Thursday, February 27, 2020 12:04 -0600 Pete Resnick <resnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I forgot to ask you Adam: How much time did you want on the > agenda? > > pr > > On 18 Jan 2020, at 16:18, Adam Roach wrote: > >> On 1/15/20 22:34, Pete Resnick wrote: >>> As the time quickly approaches for requesting a meeting for >>> the March IETF, your gendispatch chairs wonder if there are >>> agenda items for which we should schedule a meeting. Please >>> let us know on the gendispatch list (the Reply-To on this >>> message is set there) within the next two weeks if you have >>> any potential agenda items so we can decide if a meeting is >>> necessary. >> >> >> GENDISPATCH chairs -- >> >> I'm planning to spin a new version of >> draft-roach-bis-documents in the next few weeks, based on >> the feedback that has been provided so far. I think this >> would be a candidate for discussion in GENDISPATCH. >> >> /a
