Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It’s also a wider problem than announcements/reports - I only realised
> last week that there was an active mtgvenue list, one of many “admin”
> lists, and also a tools-discuss list, one of many “devops(?)” lists.
Yes, so it might be that for the set of non-WG related lists (mtgvenue is a
WG though) that we should have a policy of periodically (1-2/year) of posting
something (even if it is just the terms of reference for the list) to ietf@
or ietf-announce@ with appropriate Reply-To:
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
