Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@xxxxxxxxxx>, "last-call@xxxxxxxx" <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:31:25 +0000
Cc: "ntp-chairs@xxxxxxxx" <ntp-chairs@xxxxxxxx>, "ntp@xxxxxxxx" <ntp@xxxxxxxx>, "draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@xxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwtime.org>
References: <158169157632.16127.5189378582509283109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200219072347.GA2747553@ot.lublin.se> <0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwtime.org>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209

>    I think a list of implementations is a bad idea.
    
I could not agree more!


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Karen O'Donoghue

References:
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Daniel Lublin
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Harlan Stenn

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux