On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:46 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's *easy* to find the non-WG mailing lists:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/list/nonwg
There are only 518 of them, what's your problem?
Nothing that introducing a level of hierarchy for scaling wouldn't fix. Like basically everything else in networking :-)
Spencer
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 27-Feb-20 02:08, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Jay Daley <jay@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It’s also a wider problem than announcements/reports - I only realised
> > last week that there was an active mtgvenue list, one of many “admin”
> > lists, and also a tools-discuss list, one of many “devops(?)” lists.
>
> Yes, so it might be that for the set of non-WG related lists (mtgvenue is a
> WG though) that we should have a policy of periodically (1-2/year) of posting
> something (even if it is just the terms of reference for the list) to ietf@
> or ietf-announce@ with appropriate Reply-To:
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
