Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I propose moving IETF to pure-virtual *asynchronous* meetings as
> follows:
.... This is worth trying out.
> PROs:
> 1) The dependence on physical travel is removed.
> 2) The dependence on reliable broadband is removed.
> 3) Everyone can stay comfy in their local timezones.
> 4) Enables non-English native participants time to digest material.
> 5) Avoids having to scale infrastructure to support synchronous attendance.
> 6) Anything else?
> CONs:
> 1) In-person communication benefits are lost.
> 2) Adhoc meetings (hallway huddles, meals, etc.) are not catered to.
> 3) Presents an opportunity for corporate gaming (e.g., “prepared" responses)
> 4) Ability to show off badge-stickers eliminated ;)
> 5) No ability to share gifts
> 6) Anything else?
The big problem I see is that there could be a trend towards sophisticated video
production processes, with directors, cast, green-screens, CGI graphics.
But, I am still willing to try it out.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
