On 2/5/2020 5:48 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on draft-iab-for-the-users-02. The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-for-the-users/> The Call for Comment will last until 2020-03-04. Please send comments to architecture-discuss@xxxxxxxx and iab@xxxxxxx. Abstract: This document explains why the IAB believes the IETF should consider end users as its highest priority concern, and how that can be done. _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
Does this document represent an IAB consensus/aspiration or is this Mark writing as an IAB member?
If the former, Mark should be listed as Editor, and the document should include text indicating how the IAB arrived at consensus (e.g. "This document represents the consensus of the IAB arrived at through (internal discussions | discussions with the community | workshop results | etc) " ). If the latter, the document should indicate "This document represents the author's personal opinion".
Later, Mike -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call