On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Michael StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/5/2020 5:48 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on
> draft-iab-for-the-users-02.
>
> The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC
> within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-for-the-users/>
>
> The Call for Comment will last until 2020-03-04. Please send comments to
> architecture-discuss@xxxxxxxx and iab@xxxxxxx.
>
> Abstract:
>
> This document explains why the IAB believes the IETF should consider
> end users as its highest priority concern, and how that can be done.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
Does this document represent an IAB consensus/aspiration or is this Mark
writing as an IAB member?
If the former, Mark should be listed as Editor, and the document should
include text indicating how the IAB arrived at consensus (e.g. "This
document represents the consensus of the IAB arrived at through
(internal discussions | discussions with the community | workshop
results | etc) " ). If the latter, the document should indicate "This
document represents the author's personal opinion".
Are there competing opinions on the IAB?
"The Internet is not for End Users" ?
"The Internet is for Network Operators" ?
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
