Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard

[Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 19, 2020, at 02:23, Daniel Lublin <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Good day,

I'm not entirely convinced of keeping a list of implementations in an RFC.
But since the information is there, let's at least have it corrected and
updated upon publishing.

There shouldn’t be. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7942

which clearly states:

   Since this information is necessarily time dependent, it is
   inappropriate for inclusion in a published RFC.  The authors should
   include a note to the RFC Editor requesting that the [implementation] section be
   removed before publication.

Paul

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call