> Can you tell the community if the LLC has any plans/thoughts to stop
> looking for new places to meet, rather to just establish a list of
> 10-15 cities where we have successfully met, and simply repeat?
julien> Sticking with the same set of 10-15 cities over time can become
julien> problematic if some drop off the list when conditions degrade (in one
julien> of the may scales we use for selection). Likewise previously unlikely
julien> cities can become possible again when conditions
julien> improve. Possibilities for renewal are important.
I don't know how much the IETF LLC plans to spend for investigation of new
cities, but the previous IAOC spent some significant effort investigating new
locations.
So, of course, we'll have to add if we see that we are losing things.
This is not a straight-jacket, but rather, a policy statement that we prefer
returning to known-good places.
Some SDOs just keep going back to exactly the same 3-4 places. Period.
IEEE 802 has some set pattern, I think.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
